Source · usecases/council/README.mdMarkdown · GitHub source

usecases/council/

Concrete bindings of Agent-first Council Architecture at different evidence levels.

Council use cases differ in execution topology, model diversity, number of rounds, aggregation policy, and runtime surface. Each case must state what was observed and what remains a protocol-level proposal.

Current use cases

  • Multi-Agent Roundtable — evidence run-reported, conformance mapped; same-runtime sub-agents execute role-diverse proposal, blind review, targeted follow-up, and synthesis rounds.
  • Local LLM Council — evidence source-inspected, conformance mapped; early heterogeneous-model service implementation with three fixed stages, API/SSE/SDK surfaces, and optional Elo history.
  • Kiro Local Council — evidence field-tested, conformance mapped; same-runtime, same-model-family role-diverse design review covering selected council:L0 mechanisms, without independent CandidateArtifacts or anonymized peer review.

These are independent bindings. None defines the Council protocol by itself.